5

I know that code says no cellulose insulation with knob and tube wiring because of possible heat build up. I also know that evidence of it causing fires because of this is scarce and a few states allow cellulose if an electrician says it's in good shape.

As I air seal the attic before adding insulation there are about 10 knob and tube wires running above the kitchen ceiling, which is attic floor behind a kneewall. They were covered in blown fiberglass for probably the last 24 years.

I am having 2 different electricians come to give their recommendation and/or estimate of it it should be changed. However, since the wires come up an outside wall that's had spray foam for 8 years, go across the attic floor for about 10 feet and then disappear under a finished floor I don't see how replacing them is really that possible.

I'm going to see what the electricians say but I'm wondering about putting a piece of drywall a couple of inches above the wires, and boxing in the sides as well. That way it would be just like they are in an empty wall cavity except for the fact that there is insulation on one side and it's a ceiling cavity instead.

Thoughts?

user20127
  • 1,259
  • 6
  • 27
  • 35

5 Answers5

3

Code doesn't say that anymore, at least not in WA and OR.

Serious study was done on the question of whether blown insulation on K&T was really having an impact on house fires. The studies determined it was not. And so states have been rescinding their laws against blown insulation with K&T.

Of course AFCI is a magic bullet that intercepts many wiring faults, and I would put it on any K&T.

Sometimes K&T has problems with neutrals being crossed among several hots -- that was Wrong then, just as it is wrong now. However MWBC is a method where two hots share 1 neutral, and that was legal then, and it's legal now. The hots simply must be put on opposite poles, and the breakrs handle tied. Regardless, some of the newest AFCIs don't care about shared neutrals, but apparently only from certain makers.

If the house has blown insulation, you might downbreaker one size, merely out of an abundance of caution.

Other than that, I would continue to use it indefinitely.

Harper - Reinstate Monica
  • 313,471
  • 28
  • 298
  • 772
1

Nah. You're overthinking this, and the electricians are showing no evidence of thinking at all.

First, measure the wire: is it 14 gauge? 12 gauge? or something in between? Second, measure the breaker protecting the wire. Third, count the credible loads on the circuit. Fourth, use a handheld beeper to determine which wires are disconnected and thus irrelevant.

You only have a heat problem if there's enough current to heat the wire without tripping the breaker. If you're got 14 gauge wire, two space heaters and a 200 watt incandescent bulb and a 20 amp breaker -- problem. If you've got a circuit feeding a single light fixture with an LED bulb then no heat can possibly build up, because the wires will never get hot.

In general 14 gauge wire is good for up to 15 amps. 12 gauge wire is good for 20 amps. For safety margin, you can install the smallest breaker needed for your loads, even if it's smaller than the maximum the wire can support. Tables of wire thickness and current capacity are readily available online.


Then I'd inspect the K&T carefully, looking primarily for modern monkey splices. For a bonus, turn on all loads in the house and go up with a thermal camera, just on the off chance you've got an improperly made historic splice or modern wire nut getting warm. Satisfy yourself nothing is amiss.

Then put the insulation right back over the old wires. But take photos and leave a permanent marker above, warning any future attic explorer what lies below. You don't want anyone reaching through the insulation and grabbing a poorly insulated K&T wire.

Just remember: 14 gauge single phase knob and tube wire can carry just as much current, and will heat up just the same amount, as modern 14 gauge NM cable. Things get a bit more complicated with shared neutrals, but not much more complicated.

See also: Should old knob and tube wiring be replaced?

ThreePhaseEel
  • 87,685
  • 36
  • 144
  • 243
Bryce
  • 11,057
  • 18
  • 77
  • 120
1

Hi guys i was reading the thread here and all around here are some misguided assumptions on all parts, I'm an electrician of almost 20 years and an electrical estimator. Knob and tube wiring replacements in historic homes are something I've specialized in for over a decade now. First rule of thumb to consider when dealing with knob and tube wiring is its current use as opposed to its intended use as a manufactured system. Knob and tube wiring was only ever designed and intended to supply power to a minimal amount of equipment and appliances.

As people have expanded as a society a need for amount of power used and supplied to specific areas of a home has dramatically increased. The easiest way to simplify this statement is this, in 1908 when knob and tube was introduced typical appliances a home owner might have in the home would be a radio, a few table lamps, and if they were real fancy people they had a washing machine and or a vacuum cleaner. In today's society everything that fuels our lives requires power, so the demand that we place on these wiring systems does pose a significant risk. Over heating, improper fusing , weak splicing and the general idea that these wiring systems were never intended, designed or approved by any testing agency to remain in use for the length of time they have been. I'm not surprised to read that several electricians have said they wont consider working with you if you weren't going to replace the system, or kept stating it's against code. It is not specifically mandated in the national electrical codes to remove it unless you're renovating the home or the area of the home it exists.

However when we do start to talk about insulating around this wiring system it is extremely ill advised and should never be done. Knob and tube wiring was specifically designed to be installed in homes without insulating materials, so testing agencies or wiring manufacturers were never required to design, test or approve knob and tube wiring to be installed in or contact with any insulation material. SO that's were the liability risks begin when it comes to any home owners or contractors liability. Insulating around this type of wiring creates an assembly that was not tested or approved by any underwriting agency. SOOO the person that creates this assembly becomes liable for the damages caused as a result.

There's mention in here about loading up a circuit to its full capacity and look through the system with a thermal camera, though i agree this is a great and diverse tool I am confident in saying that this action would only prove to give false and misleading results.

My best recommendations here are similar to whats been mentioned above, but should only be done if replacement is just flat out cost or historically prohibitive. Arc fault breakers are a fantastic device though can be a fairly difficult to get them to function properly on an old wiring system, I still do highly recommend using them. They're a great safety feature that an unearth quite of few potential faults and risks with wiring systems.

Encapsulating this wiring can also be a reasonable option, you can potentially use any material that would not allow moisture or water to become trapped or stagnate. However you assemble this covering though it needs to maintain ample air space around the individual knob and tube wiring conductors. The goal is not to worry about overheating the conductor itself but however not to overheat and degrade the cloth insulation covering the conductors. It was mentioned above to use a cement board and fire stopping to seal the joints, that's a great idea however I would discuss with an architect or at least a carpenter about how much weight you might be adding to the ceiling or roof system.

Nate L
  • 11
  • 1
0

Knob and Tube - cool, in a science museum way.

I think you have the right idea. Replacing them is of course ideal, but the money thing is a reality.

I would use concrete backer board, like in a shower, drywall can absorb water.

Glue the edges of the backer board together with some firestop caulk.

Build a 3/4 inch plywood frame around the outside this, of such a size you can attach the plywood to the backer board to the ply, firestop caulk or screws.

Any thing you can do to create a complete backer board box under the tube and wire setup is only better, use firestop caulk or foam.

Angle brace, simpson strong tie, do something so when the box is kicked by someone who can not see it under insulation and have it shift into the tube and wire setup.

Best of luck with whatever you do.

Some Guy
  • 2,275
  • 12
  • 13
0

OP here, I had 2 electricians come look at the situation.

1st: kept repeating how it's against code, how the walls are spray foamed, oh my, you would have thought a kid was there with his hand in an open junction or something, the guy was just beside himself with it. He suggested replacing the wires from the panel, up the wall and across that floor. He went to his truck to call the owner and came back, saying they didn't want the job or liability if I didn't want all the wiring in all the walls replaced.

2nd: this evening a different electrician came, he first suggested running new wire across the space but said, really, it's not a big issue. I told him my three ideas: new wire from panel to there as suggested by #1, boxing it in, or arc fault breakers. He suggested boxing it in with plywood, thought that would be good, said some inspectors have been ok with it. Said adding arc fault breakers would be pricy trying to match neutrals with the other wires and would not be a gurantee. I asked for a rough estimates for arc faults, he said with all the time tracing it, plus install he thought $1,000 to $1,500. He was quite talkative and said if it were him he'd just box them in.

I'm pretty set that that's what I'm going to do.

user20127
  • 1,259
  • 6
  • 27
  • 35